If the challenges posed by the pandemic have strained your relationship, you may be considering couples therapy or relationship courses as a means of assistance. Research indicates that specific relationship education courses can enhance communication skills and overall relationship quality, potentially serving as a preventive measure against divorce. However, our research suggests that the effectiveness of such courses is influenced in part by genetic factors.
While there is substantial evidence supporting the positive impact of relationship courses on couples, an unexplored aspect is whether individuals with greater sensitivity derive more significant benefits from such programs. Sensitivity, a trait that can vary among individuals, is influenced by both upbringing and experiences, with genetic factors also playing a role.
Previous research, particularly in twins, has demonstrated that genetic factors contribute to around half of the population differences in sensitivity. Numerous genetic variants collectively influence an individual’s sensitivity. In our study, we sought to determine whether variations in genetic sensitivity could predict the extent to which individuals benefit from a relationship education program. The findings indicated that individuals with higher sensitivity were more likely to experience long-term benefits from such a program.
In our study, genetic samples were collected from 121 couples who had participated in a study on the Prevention and Relationship Education Program, a 12-hour course focusing on communication, problem-solving, and emotional support. Half of the participants received the program, while the other half underwent a control intervention. Questionnaires on marital satisfaction, communication skills, emotional connection, and divorce risk were administered before and after the intervention, with follow-ups every six months for up to two years.
Initially, individuals with higher genetic sensitivity scores did not exhibit greater immediate benefits from the relationship program compared to less sensitive individuals. However, after two years, highly sensitive individuals who underwent the program reported better marital satisfaction, communication, positive bonding, and a lower risk of divorce. This suggests that sensitive individuals may internalize the course’s teachings more deeply, applying the skills even after the program concludes, or they may be more attuned to long-term improvements in their relationships.
While our study contributes to the understanding of how genetic sensitivity can influence the outcomes of psychological programs, further research with larger samples is necessary for validation. This would help determine if and how these findings should shape future relationship interventions. It’s important to note that individuals with high genetic sensitivity are not the sole beneficiaries of relationship support, but understanding how those with lower genetic sensitivity may require tailored approaches for similar benefits is a crucial aspect to explore.